Difference between revisions of "Scanning electron microscopy"

From ImpVis Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 60: Line 60:
*''Link to Collection on ImpVis website (when created):''
*''Link to Collection on ImpVis website (when created):''
*''Any other links to resources (Miro boards / notes pages / Google Docs etc):''
*''Any other links to resources (Miro boards / notes pages / Google Docs etc):''
[[Category:Visualisation Project Pages]]
[[Category:Project pages]]

Latest revision as of 13:23, 9 February 2022


This is a template which you can use to help get you started on the wiki submission. It is just intended as a guide and you may modify the structure to suit your project.

Contributors

  • Name and what department each person was in.
  • Student or staff partner?
  • How was each person involved?
  • What rough dates did they contribute?
  • Jonathan Rackham, Department of Materials. Staff partner from October 2021.

Aims & Learning Outcomes

  • Explain the motivation for your visualisation.
  • Introduce the subject of your visualisation.
  • Which module and year is it intended for and which setting (lecture or self study)?
  • List learning outcomes. E.g.: "After using this visualisation, students should be able to explain that..."


This visualisation will be used as a teaching tool in MATE50005 (Materials Characterisation) lectures as well as self-study tools in lab sessions. It will also be useful in the MATE70001 module (MSc Characterisation course) and as a useful teaching tool when training people on the SEM.


Note that this project has crossover with the optical microscopy project.


After using this visualisation, students will be able to:

  • explain the definitions of resolution in the context of a scanning electron microscope.
  • qualitatively evaluate the impact of microscope parameters on microscope resolution.
  • perform an alignment procedure on a microscope.

Design Overview

  • What the final outcome was, how it looks, how it functions etc.
  • Include graphics.
  • Do not include justification or design progression, leave this for later sections.

Design Justification

Assessment Criteria

  • List your cohort's assessment criteria. You may want to number the assessment criteria so you can refer to them easily later.

Education Design

  • What Methods were considered to convey concepts?
  • Design progression, key choices with justifications.
  • How has feedback been incorporated.

Graphical Design

  • How were accessibility issues considered?
  • How was space used effectively?
  • Design progression, key choices with justifications.
  • How has feedback been incorporated.
  • How is the design intuitive?

Interaction Design

  • Choice of interactive element(s) that fit in organically with the visualisation [inspiration of choice might be from lecture/in-class activity or other sources] - Sliders/Buttons/Cursor (hover/click).
  • Keeping accessibility of interactive elements in mind during design phase.
  • Design progression, key choices with justifications.
  • How has feedback been incorporated.

Progress and Future Work

  • Is the design finalised?
  • Which pages have been uploaded to website?
  • Any ideas for future improvements.

Links

  • Link to GitHub repository for code in development:
  • Link to visualisation on ImpVis website (when uploaded):
  • Link to Collection on ImpVis website (when created):
  • Any other links to resources (Miro boards / notes pages / Google Docs etc):